On Thursday 26 November 2015 11:07:34 ASHOKBABU CHANNA wrote: > As "coap+tcp" is defined by IETF draft for CoAP over TCP protocol, so we > cannot use "coap+bt". (bt being the transport not a protocol) > As other fields provide transport information, we don?t see any issue while > using the MAC address like IPv4 and IPv6 address in the URI.
Hi Ashok I don't think I understand you. You're saying that there's no conflict. If what you're saying is right, then reversing the change is fine and we should not need it. We should never put a MAC address in a URI and the problem gets solved. I don't think that's what you meant. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
