On Wednesday 23 September 2015 02:23:07 ??? wrote: > e4fedb00000000 -> e 4 fedb 00000000 > e stands for 14, as per the RFC, when Option Delta is 14, it will use > Extended Option Delta. That means fedb is a part of the option delta value. > (4 is the option length) So, according to RFC, Option Delta = fedb + 269 = > 65243 + 269 = 65512. So, absolute option number is = Previous Option Number > + Option Delta = 12 + 65512 = 65524. 65524 is not defined in RFC 7252. In > RFC, it is mentioned that, > The range of 0..255 is reserved for > options defined by the IETF (IETF Review or IESG Approval). The > range of 256..2047 is reserved for commonly used options with public > specifications (Specification Required). The range of 2048..64999 is > for all other options including private or vendor-specific ones, > which undergo a Designated Expert review to help ensure that the > option semantics are defined correctly. The option numbers between > 65000 and 65535 inclusive are reserved for experiments. They are not > meant for vendor-specific use of any kind and MUST NOT be used in > operational deployments.
It comes from the Routing Manager. +/** + * Routing option number. + */ +// TODO: We need to define proper Option number. +#define RM_OPTION_MESSAGE_SWITCHING 65524 -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
