I think cloud related code should be added to service layer. The current release service layer could not handle cloud regieter (get session using github oauth).
From: iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev- bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of ???(Uze Choi) Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 7:17 PM To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org; ts_tg Subject: [dev] IoTivity base layer scope and architecture Hi IoTivity, Regarding the IoTivity architecture, let me gather opinions regarding the base layer scope. Currently CoAP-HTTP proxy is being argued about layer position. RD, collection and cloud related code need discussion whether they are worth of being in base layer. Previously group related feature has been argued one year before. Anyway, Please give the opinion for base layer scope, which may affect the mandatory API for extended platform and binary packaging unit. You can refer to the previously defined architecture posted in the wiki (https://wiki.iotivity.org/architecture.) BR, Uze Choi (OSWG Developer Ecosystem Build TG Chair) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160729/233304b6/attachment.html>
