On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Philippe Coval < philippe.coval.pro at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Gregg Reynolds <dev at mobileink.com> wrote: > >> Reviewers of https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/#/c/8603/ rightly >> pointed out that it is not maximally portable. FWIW I do not think patches >> that make Iotivity run on a new platform >> > > >> Instead of timer/linux.c, we would have timer/posix.c, which would not be >> linux-specific (would it work for Tizen?). >> > > yea Tizen is based on Linux (libc etc). or should we call it > Tizen/GNU/Linux , so no blocker here. > I am wondering about using a middleware for OS abstraction wouldn't this > help instead recreating one ? > You mean some suitably licensed c library? I'm all for that. I kinda hope there is no such thing since I didn't think to look for one before I wrote. ;) -g -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160615/7a9b1847/attachment.html>
