Thank you for the clarification. The insight is helpful. If we can help, please let us know. Thanks, ~Daniel From: Mohammad Zuberul Islam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 9:31 PM To: Ferguson, Daniel J <daniel.j.ferguson at intel.com>; Uze Choi <uzchoi at samsung.com>; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org; Antler, David A <david.a.antler at intel.com> Cc: Woohwan Lee <woohwan.lee at samsung.com>; Young Woong Kim <yw1201.kim at samsung.com>; Jonggyu Ham <jg.ham at samsung.com> Subject: Re: RE: [dev] Request for ios-port branch
Hi Daniel, Currently we are going through the windows-port branch and plan to reuse anything in-common. However, our approach for ios-port is more like wrapping rather then porting. We are using the CSDK with minimal changes and adding a wrapper layer on top of it to introduce the OBJ-C API. We do not need to port Threading, CoAP & other libraries since they can be used as it is for iOS. In the connectivity layer, we are adding platform specific adapters. I think, this approach is more similar to Android where they use JNI on top of CSDK. We plan to make a wiki document about our changes as soon as we can. Meanwhile, if we find any common ground in windows-port branch, will definitely review it. Thanks, Zuberul. ------- Original Message ------- Sender : Ferguson, Daniel J<daniel.j.ferguson at intel.com<mailto:daniel.j.ferguson at intel.com>> Date : May 13, 2016 05:08 (GMT+06:00) Title : RE: [dev] Request for ios-port branch Hi iOS platform team! We are currently working on enabling the Windows OS platform on the 'windows-port' branch. We have done extensive work to improve the portability in these areas: SCons flows, ip adapter, threading & synchronization, coap, tinydtls, and user facing shared libraries. Also, auto conf has been deeply integrated. Have you had a chance to take a look yet? We are hoping that you will find lots of useful changes. If there is something in our patches that could be useful, please review it, and we can start to expedite the submission process. We look forward to collaborating. Respectfully, Daniel Ferguson From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ???(Uze Choi) Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 2:08 AM To: m.zuberul at samsung.com<mailto:m.zuberul at samsung.com>; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: Re: [dev] Request for ios-port branch Created as "ios-port" branch. BR, Uze Choi From: Mohammad Zuberul Islam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 3:38 PM To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Cc: Woohwan Lee; Young Woong Kim; Uze Choi Subject: Request for ios-port branch Dear All, We announced our plan of ios-port few weeks back. Now, we are about to commit / upload our initial codebase. So requesting the repository owner to create a new branch. Thanks, Zuberul. Chief Engineer. Samsung R&D Institute Bangladesh. m.zuberul at samsung.com<mailto:m.zuberul at samsung.com> [cid:image001.gif at 01D1ACFA.C1724CF0] [http://ext.samsung.net/mailcheck/SeenTimeChecker?do=c4532843a6c0966fba6de89574c07cc2104dda6bdf59ed9be5300348338b50a4d3c31f387a7a8361d9d83cae48341f17ce7100ee954f3d131b20909a04efd4d2748cfe1d4e847419cf878f9a26ce15a0] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160513/2035ad13/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160513/2035ad13/attachment.gif>
