Dear all, I'm writing an IoTivity client (based on version 1.2.0 stable) on Linux and an IoTivity server based on IoTivity-constrained. IoTivity-Constrained does not set the Uri-Path CoAP option in responses (I think) because it is not mandatory. Responses are matched by the client with the CoAP Token. I investigated a bit, and I discovered that (using the 1.2.0 stable version) an IoTivity server sends responses with the Uri-Path Option set.
My question is: is it mandatory that the server responds with the Uri-Path set in responses? if not, IoTivity should extract the uri by matching the response with the sent request, and it should set it in OCRepresentation. Cheers, Mattia Antonini -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161116/bce46f5b/attachment.html>
