On Sep 29, 2016 3:41 PM, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote: > > On quinta-feira, 29 de setembro de 2016 14:56:19 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > What about a single physical device that hosts multiple OIC devices, plus an > > on-boarding tool? Does unowned-device discovery need this? > > This is supposed to affect only queries originating from the same process. > Queries originating from other processes on the same machine would still be > processed. > my understanding is that a single process could host both an on-boarding tool and an Iotivity client/server.
so I guess my question is whether the proposed change would require more extensive changes in order to support such a scenario. (fwiw, I'm still struggling to understand the structure of ownership and security provisioning.) thanks, g -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160929/68afafb2/attachment.html>
