In my current world, yes. From: Gregg Reynolds [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 1:22 PM To: Daniel Mihai <Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com> Cc: Dave Thaler <dthaler at microsoft.com>; uzchoi at samsung.com; Mats Wichmann <mats at wichmann.us>; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: RE: [dev] Public and Experimental Public C APIs
On Apr 6, 2017 3:13 PM, "Daniel Mihai" <Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com<mailto:Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com>> wrote: I?m not sure how you define ?standard production build?, but the answer is probably yes i'm not sure either ;) but mainly because i'm not sure what you'te proposing. let's say i'm an iotivity noob. i download, compile, and install. does my installation include the experimental bit? From: Gregg Reynolds [mailto:dev at mobileink.com<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 1:11 PM To: Daniel Mihai <Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com<mailto:Daniel.Mihai at microsoft.com>> Cc: uzchoi at samsung.com<mailto:uzchoi at samsung.com>; Dave Thaler <dthaler at microsoft.com<mailto:dthaler at microsoft.com>>; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org>; Mats Wichmann <mats at wichmann.us<mailto:mats at wichmann.us>> Subject: Re: [dev] Public and Experimental Public C APIs On Apr 6, 2017 2:09 PM, "Daniel Mihai via iotivity-dev" <iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org>> wrote: Should we start with the following definitions? 1. All C functions included under out/<path_to_IoTivity_SDK>/ are Public APIs 2. All C functions included under out/<path_to_IoTivity_SDK>/experimental/ are Experimental Public APIs ok just to be clear, are you proposing that out/<path_to_IoTivity_SDK>/experimental/ should be part of the stsndard production build? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170406/177ac9eb/attachment.html>
