On quarta-feira, 5 de julho de 2017 10:22:57 PDT Dave Thaler via iotivity-dev wrote: > How is that different from a unicast GET /oic/res?
There's a non-negligible action on the device to respond to that request. I would recommend getting /oic/d instead, unless we can come up with an item that is even less CPU-intensive. How about a CoAP HEAD request instead of GET? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
