Em quarta-feira, 8 de mar?o de 2017, ?s 01:31:27 CET, ??? escreveu: > I think making RAML definition is not easy in 3rd party developer's point of > view. they need to know specification to make it again. > therefore, i think this is reasonable proposal which provides API usability > improvement and way to make OCF service and device easily.
I don't think the goals are at odds. We do want the easy API. I just don't want *us* to spend time developing it for each and every resource type that OCF comes up with. I'd like us to create a code generator that does that job for us, for current as well as any future resource types. That way, developers won't need to deal with the RAML files or Swagger files. They'll use the generated API. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
