Hi Mats, 

Actually I considered the same question and couldn't come up with a perfect 
answer.  It seems to me that we either a) don't include the information (which 
is very useful to project/release managers) or b) link to Kavi because there is 
OCF only information in some of the documents (particularly the draft CRs).

Alternately, we could probably scrub the dashboard for public release (in fact 
at this point it may not be sensitive anyway), and then link to v0.3 of the CRs 
(which won't be entirely up to date).  

I felt it was better to give the best info to the IoTivity Security layer 
developers, QA, and release manager, who are all in OCF anyway, particularly 
because as Dwarka said it is not hard to join OCF if a person wants an early 
preview of the CRs/Specifications.

I am happy to follow whatever decision makes sense... I'm not passionate about 
this issue either way, just trying to get it done :)

Thanks,
Nathan

-----Original Message-----
From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dwarkaprasad 
Dayama
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 7:34 AM
To: 'Mats Wichmann' <mats at wichmann.us>; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] Request on IoTivity 1.3 release items.

Hi Mats,

I don't see any other way to document such entries. 
Giving direct attachments is anyway illegal. 
By giving link, we make sure only OCF members know about it. If a community 
member is not an OCF member, he/she should wait until the information is made 
public.

As such becoming a basic member or individual member is not difficult. So it is 
encouraged to join OCF if interested to follow OCF discussions.

Regards
Dwarka
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Software R&D Center | Software Strategy Team | Open Source Group Open 
Connectivity Foundation ? OSWG ? Spec Coordination TG Chair Iotivity Steering 
Group ? Advisory Committee

-----Original Message-----
From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mats Wichmann
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 11:16 PM
To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] Request on IoTivity 1.3 release items.

On 03/16/2017 02:50 AM, ??? (Uze Choi) wrote:
> Hi, Feature contributors in 1.3 release.
> 
>  
> 
> Please check as below. and respond by this week.
> 
>  
> 
> [Jira Registration/Tagging into wiki]
> 
> Please add Jira tick link on 
> https://wiki.iotivity.org/1.3_release_plan. as like security related item.
> 
> Introspection, Versioning, Endpoint
> 
> MPM, AllJoyn Bridge, UPnP Bridge
> 
> CoAP Native Cloud Project items.
> 
> Generic Java Binding.

Just to circle back on this once more - should IoTivity wiki entries or Jira 
tickets contain links to non-public OCF resources?  It's clear that certain 
developers of iotivity may have to refer to unpublished materials in preparing 
for a new release, and are able to do so if they "live in both camps", but 
including such links in the public IoTivity resources makes them opaque to 
readers without OCF member status.

If the team feels this is okay, I won't ask about it any more.

Examples:

This 1.3 wiki page:
===
Security updates (see dashboard spreadsheet for details) (the "dashboard 
spreadsheet" is a link to
https://workspace.openconnectivity.org/apps/org/workgroup/security_os_tg/download.php/8839/IoTivity%201.3%20Security%20Feature%20Dashboard.xlsx)
===

Jira ticket to provide software update hooks
(https://jira.iotivity.org/browse/IOT-1786):

===
The CR 24 can be found on Kavi:
https://workspace.openconnectivity.org/apps/org/workgroup/security_wg/download.php/8395/CR_SecWG_OCF1.0_00024.004_SoftwareUpdate.docx

... and the OCF bugzilla is private:

The Bugzilla issue number is 1384:
https://bugzilla.openconnectivity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1384
===


_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

Reply via email to