Hi developers,

I tried to supply my sampleserver_justworks app with a modified
oic_svr_db_server_justworks.json, as I'd like to defines ACL in V1 format,
instead of using the original V2 ACLs, but the provisioning client can't
discover this unowned device anymore if the device uses V1 ACL. Is it right
behavior or any restrictions when to use V1 ACLs? it looks to me the V1 ACL
accepts "*" uuid, and I am hesitated to use the connection type ACE in V2,
so I'm wondering why the use of V1 ACL causing the unowned device becomes
undiscoverable?

Best Regards,
Tonny
_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

Reply via email to