Now that the master libcoap supports the latest COAP-over-TCP draft (and other features we would want like FETCH/PATCH), I think what we would need would be to update iotivity's use of libcoap to use the master version rather than our fork which is missing features and doesn't support the latest draft.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mats Wichmann Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 9:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dev] FW: [core] Testing CoAP/TCP at the IETF100 Hackathon? On 11/09/2017 06:33 AM, Dave Thaler via iotivity-dev wrote: > Attention any COAP-over-TCP implementers: there's a discussion / interop > event on Saturday > where remote participation is allowed. The message below is from Olaf > Bergmann, maintainer > of libcoap, saying he'll be a remote participant. Speaking of Olaf... what work do we need to do to get off of having two different forked libcoap implementations and back to using at worst a frozen instance of upstream? _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.iotivity.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fiotivity-dev&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7Cebde3aecf610492ae96508d52779b24d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636458326046171834&sdata=2erDSDy26A9YwadtOkBL14ZgTkg56TbJKnuli%2FquQQU%3D&reserved=0
--- Begin Message ---Maybe hidden in the Internet-Draft deadline frenzy, we have submitted -10 of the TCP/TLS draft. This should cover the remaining IESG comments (there is still some work outstanding on coap-at://, but that will not be done in this document): https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-10&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C049b8c36d4ee46c18edc08d5249914f5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636455162262118425&sdata=9y8j9wBZc7kDwaLiw6pMm4%2FB2ACV2uAhKinAY3VE280%3D&reserved=0 In other news, the CoAP-over-TCP patch has landed for libcoap: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fobgm%2Flibcoap%2Fpull%2F113&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C049b8c36d4ee46c18edc08d5249914f5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636455162262118425&sdata=P7nhKNfJjpf26zgdhJehyDbVOBhrVZPS3eGP1kq3mag%3D&reserved=0 I’m not entirely sure about the status of CoAP/TCP in Californium, but finding out the answer is exactly what hackathons are really good at. And of course for aiocoap, coap.me, etc. So who would be up to a CoAP-over-TCP session at the IETF100 hackathon? (Local and remote participation are both fine.) We would probably want to reserve a two-hour slot sometime during the Saturday where remote participants are sure they can find someone in the hackathon room who is also working on this. We could meet at https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjitsi.tools.ietf.org%2Fcoap-tcp&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C049b8c36d4ee46c18edc08d5249914f5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636455162262118425&sdata=jd2lpZhSALxhTJVuyQ4sKGj2RRP8NsflkJ6j5nWXKYA%3D&reserved=0 Any preferences for the time on Saturday? Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ core mailing list [email protected] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcore&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C049b8c36d4ee46c18edc08d5249914f5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636455162262118425&sdata=6FBaGCyZ0SmtE8n1aKC7XgLznIZg26S%2FAF1Gafe8Wz8%3D&reserved=0
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
