On quarta-feira, 22 de novembro de 2017 15:44:25 PST Dave Thaler wrote: > > [That's also why, when selecting a Cloud infrastruture to host my new > > server, both Google Compute Engine and Microsoft Azure were discarded, > > without looking at prices] > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/load-balancer/load-balancer-ipv6-over > view
I found that, but I don't need a load balancer for a single VM that barely has any traffic, so I don't want to pay for it just so I have IPv6. "The load balancer routes the IPv6 packets to the private IPv6 addresses of the VMs using network address translation (NAT). The IPv6 Internet client cannot communicate directly with the IPv6 address of the VMs." If it weren't this tiny detail, Azure's offering was superior to AWS in almost every way. And the price calculator is a lot easier to use. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
