On Dec 5, 2017 12:00 PM, "Mats Wichmann" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/05/2017 10:48 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 08:47:44 PST Mats Wichmann wrote: >> I can say from my time working on OCF certification that the intent was >> always for app cert to be possible. I was never sure if there would be a >> lot of market for it (won't speak for anyone else on that, just my >> opinion). If I'm building, say, smart lightbulbs that I want to exist >> in an OCF network, I want those certified, but my app that controls my >> lightbulbs is just an addon - I give it away to help people use the >> bulbs I sell, but I don't generate any direct revenue from it, and I >> might not have a lot of interest in dealing with other aspects of the >> OCF protocols that don't relate to running those lightbulbs. > > FYI, the long-term objective of OCF is that you *don't* make that app. > The control of all of your OCF-enabled devices should be done by applications > you already have installed, hopefully much more complete and more featureful > than what your simple lightbulb controller would be. I don't want to install > your app, plus Samsung Connect for my washing machine plus LG's equivalent for > my TV, etc. One application must suffice for most uses. agree 100%. today, I'm not sure I know who is building that app, though. OCF? IoTivity? Cisco? etc. OpenOCF? 😋 _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
