I am glad that you replied Thiago.

Just to provide you an overview of a roadmap, or how we as a Kistler see the 
IoTivity Cloud further development:
 - HTTP proxy
      @ communication between IoTivity Cloud and other product components 
through HTTP, fully compliant with a OCF specification

 - Cloud enabled
      @ current Cloud system is not scalable nor reliable. Currently you cannot 
restart component (e.g. rolling update or just node restart would drop your 
db). Goal would be to redesign a communication between the Cloud components and 
a way how it manipulates with a data, to support availability, reliability and 
mainly scalability.

 - Resource shadow
      @ device shadow is a well-known term in a IoT world. We have a PoC of a 
resource shadow already implemented, so we would start with OCF specification 
proposal.

 - Documentation and maintanance

If community agrees, let's start.

BR
Ondrej Tomcik

On 27 Apr 2018, at 21:58, Thiago Macieira 
<thiago.macie...@intel.com<mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com>> wrote:

On Friday, 27 April 2018 00:37:44 PDT Ondrej Tomcik wrote:
I would propose to change current list of maintainers. They are inactive and
it is not acceptable in open source project.

If there are no objections, we'll do that.

For anyone willing to object: your objections must come with a solution to
Ondrej's problems.

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com<http://intel.com>
 Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center



_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org>
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

Reply via email to