On Fri, Dec 28, 2018, 3:36 PM Mats Wichmann <[email protected] wrote: > On 12/28/18 1:01 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > ted. > > > > interface > > > >> is a horribly overloaded term and I wish OCF had picked a > >> different name for this > > > > > > Not just overloaded. Plain wrong. A better name would be "capability". It > > really has nothing to do with oo or interfaces. If your resource does not > > support the write "interface", you cannot write to it. That's a > permission > > idea, has nothing to do with the concept "interface", afaik. > > > > I suspect this reflects a basic confusion about APIs v. Protocols. > > "Interface" is largely meaningless with respect to comm protocols, imho. > > something like is this what I believe the guy who came up with that > concept for the OCF specs was thinking of: > > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/interfaces/index
To quote POTUS: so sad! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10106): https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/10106 Mute This Topic: https://lists.iotivity.org/mt/28815690/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
