Hi Bob, On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:26:31PM -0800, Bob McMahon wrote: > I've loaded a rawhide system and have been able to reproduce this. I won't > be able to get to fault isolation until early next week. Hope that's ok.
Anything (and whenever) you can do will be much appreciated ! :) Thanks again, --Gabriel > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Gabriel L. Somlo <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm packaging iperf-2.* in Fedora, and since rawhide switched to gcc > >> 6.0 I'm getting an error during build: > >> > >> ... > >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include -Wall -O2 -g > >> -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > >> -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > >> -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 > >> -m64 -mtune=generic -c string.c > >> In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/cmath:42:0, > >> from /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/math.h:36, > >> from ../include/headers.h:85, > >> from ../include/Timestamp.hpp:63, > >> from delay.cpp:55: > >> /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:205:12: error: > >> redefinition of 'struct std::__is_integer<int>' > >> struct __is_integer<int> > >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/cmath:42:0, > >> from /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/math.h:36, > >> from ../include/headers.h:85, > >> from ../include/Timestamp.hpp:63, > >> from delay.cpp:55: > >> /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:138:12: error: previous > >> definition of 'struct std::__is_integer<int>' > >> struct __is_integer<bool> > >> > >> Makefile:386: recipe for target 'delay.o' failed > >> make[2]: *** [delay.o] Error 1 > >> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > >> make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/iperf-2.0.8/compat' > >> Makefile:377: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed > >> make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/iperf-2.0.8' > >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > >> make: *** [all] Error 2 > >> Makefile:317: recipe for target 'all' failed > >> > >> > >> Any clue about how this might be worked around would be much > >> appreciated ! > >> > >> Thanks much, > >> --Gabriel > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > >> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > >> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > >> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Iperf-users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Iperf-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
