>> Consider also that the nature of iperf is to saturate the available channel.
This isn't the case anymore for iperf 2.0.13 and greater. Saturating the channel has lots of negative effects with respect to testing per buffer bloat. 2.0.13 and greater has many features to support unsaturated channels where latency is a primary metric. Bob On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:26 AM Sandro Bureca <sbur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Try to solve this need at network level by configuring QOS or COS or > interface speed. > That said, flooding the network with udp packets is possible even without > an iperf server on your side. > Consider also that the nature of iperf is to saturate the available > channel. > Sandro > > Il gio 3 ott 2019, 13:41 van Kan, Michel (VodafoneZiggo) < > michel.van...@vodafoneziggo.com> ha scritto: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Can a maximum allowed UDP bandwidth be set in the iperf3 server setting >> so clients cannot use extreme values for the UDP downlink bandwidth? I like >> to avoid that hackers can fully utilize the network bandwidth. >> >> >> >> If not what are the alternatives? >> >> >> >> >> >> BR, >> >> >> >> Michel >> >> C2 VodafoneZiggo Internal >> _______________________________________________ >> Iperf-users mailing list >> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Iperf-users mailing list > Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users >
_______________________________________________ Iperf-users mailing list Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
