JD Bronson wrote: > ... > Here are some of the actual non-parsed log rejections: > > May 18 18:20:42 lexi ipmon[124]: 18:20:41.942290 sppp0 @0:59 b > 69.147.64.124,43761 -> 192.168.82.170,25 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN NAT > May 18 18:20:49 lexi ipmon[124]: 18:20:49.831577 sppp0 @0:59 b > 69.147.64.124,43761 -> 192.168.82.170,25 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN NAT > May 18 18:21:06 lexi ipmon[124]: 18:21:05.600252 sppp0 @0:59 b > 69.147.64.124,43761 -> 192.168.82.170,25 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN NAT > May 18 18:21:37 lexi ipmon[124]: 18:21:37.126844 sppp0 @0:59 b > 69.147.64.124,43761 -> 192.168.82.170,25 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN NAT > May 18 18:23:43 lexi ipmon[124]: 18:23:42.984772 sppp0 @0:59 b > 69.147.64.169,26735 -> 192.168.82.170,25 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN NAT > May 18 18:23:51 lexi ipmon[124]: 18:23:50.853821 sppp0 @0:59 b > 69.147.64.169,26735 -> 192.168.82.170,25 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN NAT > May 18 18:24:06 lexi ipmon[124]: 18:24:06.591992 sppp0 @0:59 b > 69.147.64.169,26735 -> 192.168.82.170,25 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN NAT > May 18 18:24:38 lexi ipmon[124]: 18:24:38.068355 sppp0 @0:59 b > 69.147.64.169,26735 -> 192.168.82.170,25 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN NAT > > ... > Does this give anyone an idea as to why email is (at times) being > rejected?
Are you able to capture a session that doesn't work with tcpdump? tcpdump -w bad-smtp -s 1536 port 25 And what settings change/dont change in output from "ipfstat -s", "ipnat -s", "ipfstat -f" and "ipfstat" that might indicate a problem? Darren
