Carson Gaspar wrote: > --On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 11:56 AM +0100 Robin Breathe > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> We've run into a bug using pfil configured ipmp interfaces with the >> fastroute "to int0:A.B.C.D" syntax under Solaris 9. The packets appear >> to simply be dropped, showing up as "Fastroute failures". > > Don't use IPMP, use real channel bonding, and you can do what you want. > IPMP as-is just won't work for you.
Carson, Would you mind elaborating? I'm looking for resilience (i.e. IPMP) not performance (which, if I understand correctly, is what channel bonding gives you)? By my understanding, pfil's ipmp interface is meant to give you a logical handle to the "active" interface within an IPMP group. It seems logical that the "to if:ip" syntax should work in this context. If this understanding is wrong, please enlighten me :) Regards, Robin -- Robin Breathe, Computer Services, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1865 483685 Fax: +44 1865 483073
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
