On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Darren Reed wrote:
Pekka Savola wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Darren Reed wrote:
ok, please apply the attach patch so I can collect some information from
the kernel.

The output is like follows (there are no such messages if FTP proxy is
disabled):

fdata:maxend 1129616061 end 1129616337
fdata:end 1129672809 seq 1129614889
fdata:winflags 4 winscale 0
tdata:winflags 0 winscale 0
ack 2182360656 ackskew 0 win 65160 << 0 maxwin 8192

Ah, I think I've read the RFC incorrectly and interpreted it to
mean that if either end is not doing window scaling then it is
not enabled.

The attached diffs should undo that madness.

Hmm.. it still doesn't seem to work.  The messages are like:

fdata:maxend 4163995118 end 4163996566
fdata:end 4163995118 seq 4163995118
fdata:winflags 7 winscale 6
tdata:winflags 0 winscale 0
ack 423266013 ackskew 0 win 4170240 << 6 maxwin 8192
fdata:maxend 4163995682 end 4163998014
fdata:end 4163995118 seq 4163996566
fdata:winflags 7 winscale 6
tdata:winflags 0 winscale 0
ack 423266013 ackskew 0 win 4170240 << 6 maxwin 8192
fdata:maxend 4163995682 end 4163999462
fdata:end 4163995118 seq 4163998014
fdata:winflags 7 winscale 6
tdata:winflags 0 winscale 0
ack 423266013 ackskew 0 win 4170240 << 6 maxwin 8192
fdata:maxend 4163995682 end 4164000910
fdata:end 4163995118 seq 4163999462
fdata:winflags 7 winscale 6
tdata:winflags 0 winscale 0

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

Reply via email to