" From: Paul Theodoropoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " " I've solved my problem as follows. " " [] " " i've fixed the problem by moving " " pass out quick proto tcp from 206.176.249.129/28 to any flags S keep state " " from the middle to the *bottom* of the ruleset, whilst removing the " flags declaration - " " pass out quick proto tcp from 206.176.249.129/28 to any keep state " " While I have a vague understanding of why that fixed it, the " important thing is that now mail with attachments can flow through to " the sbcglobal mailservers without any problem at all. Why their " mailservers - and only their mailservers - were sensitive to the " former configuration is a mystery to me. But even as a n00b, it seems " to me it indicates a problem at att/sbcglobal/pacbell, not so much " one on my end. Rather, i've had to modify a previously working " configuration to accomodate whatever (bizarre) problem they have on their end.
i wonder if it's the flags, and they're not handling tcp handshaking quite pukka? ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen [EMAIL PROTECTED] and think what none thought
