On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 07:46:44AM +0800, Darren Reed wrote: > It depends on what you consider a "security" problem...
I'd mostly be worried about a bug that could provide remote code execution without authentication, provide an elevated level of privilege, or cause a crash. > ..for example, the non-fragmented logging problem (fixed in 3.4.34) > might worry some I can live with a logging problem. > ..the fix for ipf_pullup() in 3.4.33 could be cause for concern about > reliability Reliability how? Any risk of something crashing? > ..the ftp proxy fixes for .29 might be cause for concern if you use that They had no ipnat.conf at all. When they told me that, I recommended that they start using it for FTP active mode to work, but if that's a problem, I'll just tell them to forget I said that. Thanks! - Morty
