Oracle has no problems with me doing it but would own all of the
intellectual property (i.e copyright) for all of the work that I would do.
*I* have a problem with that given that I would be doing it on my time
and it would be me handing out freebies to a very wealthy man/company.
Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
The question is not if Darren intends, but if Oracle still permits
Darren to continue open development.
My fear is that we'll have another fork...
-= Mail sent through WebTop2 =-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Da:* Simon Chang <[email protected]>
*A:* [email protected]
*Data:* 29 ottobre 2010 9.18.41 CEST
*Oggetto:* Re: IPFilter no more?
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Summum Bonum <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yeah.. I am wondering about that too. Where is Darren Reed? I
did a cvs
on the latest branch, and there is no update for a while.
I am about to rip out the public version of ip filter replace
with the
official Sun/Oracle version. Look like that is the supported
version
going forward for us Sun admin.. Just upgraded to Solaris 10
update 9,
and I don't bother to it against 5.1.0 :(
Hi,
Long time ipfilter user, but first time posting on the mailing
list. I have various versions of FreeBSD running ipf 4.1.28, and I
have been frustrated by the fact that the documentation seems
muddled and confusing regarding the exact compilation procedure
for 5.1.0.
Also, yes, based on the list volume that I checked, this list
seems to be *VERY* low-volume and has been that way for a while
now. Does anyone know what the status is for ipfilter, what the
general direction is, and whether Darren intends to continue
development?
Cheers,
Simon Chang
