I was coming from the standpoint of an iPhone app vs a webpage that works on the iPhone. Meaning their demo doesn't even show the three special links in use. It isn't iPhone specific in the least bit, so it has little purpose for an iPhone app developer. There is no -webkit CSS used. 75% of their 'code' is the Apple disclaimer/NDA text.
If they are going to tell us we can make any web based app look/feel like their built in apps, then I believe the sample code should reflect how to do that. Ie.Why not use the sliding div code handed out at the tech talks in the example on the developer site? So, yes, I believe there is a difference when it comes to making iPhone specific apps, but not so much when creating web pages that work well on the iPhone. No hover. Mousedown/mouseup happen at the same time, but only after the finger is released etc.. If Joe hadn't come up with and released his iUI, there would be a lot fewer iPhone 'apps' today. Apple's sample doesn't look like it was made to show off the iphone, it's just a javascript example. -=R On 8/8/07 7:20 AM, "craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 7, 8:52 pm, Randy Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yeah, I didn't know what to make of their 'samples.' I wrote to them that >> they seemed more like Javascript 101 examples than how to make killer apps >> work on the iPhone. > > Then again, is there a real difference? ;-) Other than a few special > hyperlinks and some viewport settings, I haven't found much about > iPhone "app" development that differs from making generic javascript > based web apps. > > Craig > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iPhoneWebDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
