On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Dmitry Bazhenov <dim...@pigeonpoint.com> wrote: [...] >> 1] ``const char *section_id[4]'' - is there no chance at all this is >> going to be extended at some point in future? If it is, I'd be for >> better solution. My point is ``for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)'' and if it >> gets extended so must code which follows/is using/iterate over it. But >> may be I'm wrong. > Is 'for ( i = 0; i < sizeof(section_id) / siceof(section_id[0]); i++)' > solves the issue?
Dmitry, I'm not sure if there was an issue to begin with. But to be honest, this one looks scary. Please, let me think about it a bit, try something; I'll try to come up with some constructive(= better?). If I can't think of anything better, I guess, I shouldn't ask you to. I mean, I don't know. I'll think about it, try stuff, we'll see, ok? :) Have a nice weekend, Z. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
