On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:10 AM, milos <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> I highly discourage such procedures, since it should be the ipmi devels
> responsibility the ipmitool is POSIX compliance.
> Please, take this into consideration if possible for future developments.
Hello Milos,
if there were any developers, they probably would. It's (F)OSS. If you have
itch, scratch it. Either by yourself, or by paying somebody.
Sorry, but that's how it is.
Best regards,
Z.
--
Zdenek Styblik
email: [email protected]
jabber: [email protected]
>
> Best regards,
> M
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Ipmitool-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Ipmitool-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
