Tatuya,
Yes, it is equivalent to the "local scope" defined in
RFC 2365 and RFC 2730. It should be noted that those documents
refer to IPv6 scope 3 currently, but will need to be changed
to scope 4.
Brian
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:25:13 -0700,
> >>>>> Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > - Multicast scope name changes:
> > o Changed name of scope value 1 from "node-local" to
> > "interface-local"
> > o Reserved scope value 3 for "subnet-local" for multi-link
> > subnets
> > o Defined scope value 4 as "admin-local"
>
> What is the "admin-local" scope? Is it an IPv6 version of
> "Administratively Scoped Multicast"?
>
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> Communication Platform Lab.
> Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Brian Haberman
Nortel Networks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
