> I think we did discuss this is the past and concluded that the v4-mapped
> v6 addresses were only meaningful when carrying IPv4 non-loopback, unicast
> addresses. Thus, the IPv6 node should not have to do multiple, different
> prefix checks to determine if an address is a multicast address or a
> loopback address.
I thought that discussion was for IPv4-compatible addresses.
Did we have the discussion for IPv4-mapped addresses as well?
Erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
