nicely put. Or we are told. This was already discussed before. I was here
Dan's postulate argument and the idea of perl scripts was not discussed
before.
regards,
/jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Ian Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday,February 07,2001 8:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: The case against A6 and DNAME
>
>
> D. J. Bernstein writes ("The case against A6 and DNAME"):
> > I recommend that the A6 and DNAME proposals be terminated.
> I've set up a
> > web page on this topic:
> >
> > http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html
>
> As I've stated before, I strongly agree. I asked here what the
> purpose of A6 and DNAME are, and the end result has been that we're
> told that they're a fancy macro scheme to save zone administrators
> having to write trivial perl scripts.
>
> Ian.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
