"Powell, Ken" wrote:
> I suppose another option would be to add a
> "request aggregate prefix list" flag bit to
> the router solicitation message. Such a flag
> bit would be easier to implement in that
> it would only impact the part of the stack
> that deals with router solicitation/advertisement
> processing.
>
> What do others prefer?
I prefer this new RS type.
If the HA needs to know what home _link_ is in question, in case there
are more than one, it can use the destination address of the RS. Thus,
one fewer purpose for the home address option.
> I think the home agent should treat RS/RA exchanges
> between HA and Mobile node's COA as a completely
> separate situation and make no attempt to associate
> them with a particular mobile node or binding.
Yes.
/Mattias
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
