On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:16:21PM +0859, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Dan;
>
> It's your problem.
>
> > Paul A Vixie writes:
> > > i have not, yet, heard anything new against A6 in this round of the debate.
> >
> > http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html
>
> How about:
>
> aol.com. NS ns0.aol.net.
> aol.com. NS ns1.aol.net.
>
> aol.net. NS ns0.aol.com.
> aol.net. NS ns1.aol.com.
>
> ?
In this case, ns[01].aol.{net,com} will be in the {net,com} zones as
glue.
I think the question that I have yet to see answered that Dan is
not articulating well is "how the hell is DNS glue supposed to work
sanely with A6?" I can't find an answer to that myself. Everybody's
talking about no full IP addresses written anywhere, and DNS
delegation is one place where that just doesn't work. You need the
full 128 bit address in there, and glue registry is the one place
that these addresses can't change frequently, because of the bulk
of TLD zones and complicated, time consuming procedures registrars
use to update those records...
--
David Terrell | "I went into Barnes and Noble to look for a
Prime Minister, Nebcorp | book on A.D.D., but I got bored and left."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | - Benjy Feen
http://wwn.nebcorp.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
