1. I won't be at the meeting. However, I strongly support elimination of
A6/DNAME: http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html
2. There's a common error in the evaluation of DNSSEC signing costs. I'd
like to draw attention to a new section that I've added to my web page
to analyze this error: http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html#signingcosts
3. I don't understand why this is an ngtrans issue rather than an ipngwg
issue. The question is not how to move smoothly to A6/DNAME; the
question is whether we want A6/DNAME at all.
---Dan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
