On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Peter Bieringer wrote: > --On Wednesday, February 20, 2002 12:05:27 AM -0800 David Terrell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:44:03PM +0100, Peter Bieringer wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> during implementing bit-string label support in "ipv6calc" I run > >> (for me) into a problem and found no example. > > > > Save your energy, bit-strings are being deprecated in the ip6.arpa > > tree. > > Is this an official statement? Who tell this all very modern > resolvers...
There are no official statements, but you may want to look at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-ipv6-addresses-00.txt or minutes from Dnsext/ngtrans joing meeting in IETF51 in London. No resolvers as such (used by default in operating systems) that I know of implement A6/DNAME; BIND9 lwres and friends are the only ones I think. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
