> | You want to support IPsec and that's fine. However I don't > | think you always want to run IPsec when the result is for > | example a possible higher packet loss rate. > > No, of course you don't always want to run it. Why you you think > that anyone always wants to run it? But when you need IPsec, you > need it - and that you happen to be using a cellular link for some > particular communications is irrelevant. Whether to use IPsec or > not will depend upon the particular communications at any particular > instant, and needs to be able to be determined by the user - > certainly > never by the implementor, who has no idea what environment > (which includes > the remote end of communications) the equipment will be used in.
The mail I responded to was about disabling DAD and IPsec. /Karim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------