Jari, I agree. But if we cannot get consensus quickly then its time to move on to the issues of use deployment elsewhere.
/jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:30 AM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: Brian Haberman; Margaret Wasserman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Updating draft-ietf-ipv6-cellular-host-00.txt? > > > Bound, Jim wrote: > > > > John et al. Bag this lets go build a cellular host consortia with > > vendors that want to ship and deploy IPv6 and build our use > requirements > > out of here. > > > > Or we will be hacking on this in January 2003. It was a > good thing to > > try but it might not work to do use / implementation reqs > in the IETF. > > Thats fine though. > > > Given that deployment starts this year and standards releases > are weeks > or at most months away, I'm sure decisions *will* be made as > to what goes to the > devices. The guestion is who will make the recommendations on what the > devices do. My strong preference though is that this WG makes > them, because > the expertise is here. > > Jari > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
