On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Erik Nordmark wrote: > I don't have a problem removing compatible addresses from the addressing > architecture, but I also don't think it is required. > Once RFC2893bis blows it away its gone whether or not the addressing > architecture contains the defintion for compatible addresses.
I suggested removing compat-addrs earlier, but it didn't get support from Bob.. perhaps now it's a better time. IMO, if the aim is to get rid of compats in RFC2893bis, talking about compatible addresses in new addrarch (which is draft standard, so it'll be around for a long time..) is just plain confusing. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
