From: Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >From an implementor's point of view, manating RO will pose noticeable > > > extra work to all IPv6 implementors. It is not so easy to implement > > > RO (which means implementing the RR procedure and BCE management). > > > > from another implementor's point of view, this is nonsense. a lot > > of emphasis has been placed on the current MIPv6 internet draft to > > minimise the work the CN has to do. I can get you some code, if you > > think it is so difficult to implement. > > Please show. Is it 50 lines, 100?
I hope it easy. In my code (though I did not implemented any RR code yet), a binding cache management requires 250 lines or over. an extension header management requires 800 lines or over. plus some header files. I did not count any lines which was required to modify to support CN functions on the existing code (such as ip_input/output, nd_input/output, etc..). The final code will be greater than this. Again, I did not implemnted RR yet. I don't have a concrete idea how many lines do we need to implement RR. It may be trivial or... # of course, it depends on implementors if this number is big or small... Best Regards, --- Keiichi SHIMA IIJ Research Laboratory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KAME Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------