>> as far as I remember from the past presentations, Hardie draft did >> propose interdomain anycast scheme. the diagram in appendix A look >> like intradomain, however, section 1.4 and 1.5 does not have any >> restriction on intra/interdomain. the diagram I saw at dnsop meeting >> was interdomain (single prefix advertised with a single AS #, from >> multiple different location). > >The latter sounds like the Ohta draft.
it seemed to me Ohta draft and Hardie draft were exactly the same, modulo the usage policy of AS #s. also for me Hardie draft (now RFC) does not seem to put any restriction to be intradomain. it just doesn't say anything about intra/interdomain. >> webserver for past olympic games. i don't have any citable document >> on it. >Was this usage interdomain or not? >Perhaps there is some IBM reference (even if it is not stable) that can be >added. Independent of that some more explanation of how it's been used >with http would be helpful. interdomain. single prefix advertised with a single AS #, from multiple different location (route injected into multiple different ISPs). itojun -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------