>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:10:44 +0200,
>>>>> Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> the co-existence of ip6.int and ip6.arpa tree will require us to:
>> query ip6.arpa;
>> if (no record)
>> query ip6.int;
>> for backward compatibility. was it taken into account, or did you
>> test just "ip6.arpa" lookups?
> I checked the source code for BIND 9.2.1, and IIRC it checks
> ip6.int first and then ip6.arpa second. This allows us to stand up
> ip6.arpa whenever, and then once that is set, we can tear down
> ip6.int.
What exactly do you mean by BIND 9.2.1?
1. the resolver library under lib/bind
2. the resolver routine in lwresd
3. both 1 and 2
4. others
In my understanding (I've quickly checked the code again, too), both 1
and 2 only tries ip6.arpa with bitstring labels.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
