IPv6 folk, I just posted some crude text for a GUSL proposal (I don't call this a draft yet. Note the small difference between "crud" and "crude" :-).
What you do not need to mention: -------------------------------- - It is crude. - It needs to be fluffed out. - There is no boilerplate. - It does not solve _all_ the issues with site-locals. What I would like you to comment on: ------------------------------------ - There is no specifics about the hash/random algorithm. I do not think that we need to specify any as long as the vendor/implementer makes sure that there is a good enough seed/whatever-is-necessary to guarantee the lowest level of collisions. What I forgot: -------------- Whatever the method used, the site is assigned a /48. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
