Thanks for your answer, I agree that IPsec should be prefered. Kind regards.
Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > Does anyone know if TCP MD5 signature option (RFC 2385) used for MP-BGP > is applicable for IPv6 ? > > => it should because RFC 2385 uses the pseudo-header (defined for each > TCP over foo) for the network layer part... IMHO IPsec is far better > but RFC 2385 is applicable if you don't have IPsec. > > Regards > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > PS: of course you should have IPsec if you have IPv6 (:-)! > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------