Hi all, I will re-read 3041, craft some text, point to a relevant section in 3041. I'll try to get this done today.
thanks, John > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Thomas Narten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 February, 2003 05:12 > To: Alain Durand > Cc: Loughney John (NRC/Helsinki); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Node Requirements and 3041 > > > Alain, > > All your points are valid, but I'd argue the node requirements > document is the wrong place to have this level of detail. > > Instead, 3041 should be respun with more text about these issues. I > think Node requirements would be better off (in general) just pointing > to other basic documents and let folks go there for the details. If > the details aren't there, the question should be asked whether a > revision is approriate. > > Thomas > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
