[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don't see the need as long as the result is 16-bits, but would like to > > see if there are other opinions. > > My opinion would be to reject more than 4 hex digits.
RFC 2553, section 6.6: #define INET6_ADDRSTRLEN 46 I'm not 100% sure about the relevance of this, but it seems like a good reason not to allow exta digits. -- Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ipnet6.org/ "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------