On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:29:15 +0200 Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I almost agree, except that I would insist on "no cost". > > > Low cost is often impossible, since that even a base charge > > > for $0.50 requires invoicing across several continents and > > > purchasing departments and levels of approval. > > > > are you saying that the process for obtaining a domain name is already > > too onerous? seems like this should be an upper bound on the effort > > required to get a PI prefix. > > True enough. But 10 EUR is a disincentive to hoarding or DoS, whereas > $0.00 would not be. I certainly don't have a problem with a 10 EUR one-time charge. And I think the registry has a lot more chance of success if it pays its own way. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------