I support what Brian stated and the ADs please lets move on here. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal > > > Scott Bradner wrote: > > > > fwiw - I fully agree with kre > > (that has happened before in case anyone wondered) > > fwiw, I don't (and I have both agreed and disagreed with kre > and sob in the past). > > I really think this is a distraction. Objectively, the WG is > getting on with the three things that need to be done > (requirements, an alternative proposal, and a draft > deprecation document). To me there was manifestly rough > consensus for this course of action: what else could > "deprecate site local" mean to anyone who had been reading > the mailing list for the previous several months? The details > naturally depend on those three documents, which will have to > be taken through due process. There was certainly not > unanimity, or a detailed proposal, when choosing this course of > action, but that's no ground for overruling the chairs. > > Brian > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > - - Brian E Carpenter > Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM > > NEW ADDRESS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLEASE UPDATE ADDRESS BOOK > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------