>    This document formally deprecates the IPv6 site-local unicast prefix
>    defined in [RFC3513], i.e. 1111111011 binary or FEC0::/10. The
>    special behavior of this prefix MUST no longer be supported in new
>    implementations. 

Does this imply "but SHOULD otherwise be treated like a global unicast
prefix"? 

>    However, router implementations SHOULD be configured to prevent
>    routing of this prefix by default.

in the interests of increased precision, by "routing", do you mean:

        (distributing routing information relating to fec0::/10) or 
        (forwarding packets with destination in fec0::/10) or 
        (forwarding packets with source or destination in fec0::/10)

or some combination thereof?

                                                - Bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to