> This document formally deprecates the IPv6 site-local unicast prefix > defined in [RFC3513], i.e. 1111111011 binary or FEC0::/10. The > special behavior of this prefix MUST no longer be supported in new > implementations.
Does this imply "but SHOULD otherwise be treated like a global unicast prefix"? > However, router implementations SHOULD be configured to prevent > routing of this prefix by default. in the interests of increased precision, by "routing", do you mean: (distributing routing information relating to fec0::/10) or (forwarding packets with destination in fec0::/10) or (forwarding packets with source or destination in fec0::/10) or some combination thereof? - Bill -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------