Yaron, I think its ready for the WG LC.
Jack On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > we've done a lot of work on this document as a group, and it may well be > ready to go through WG Last Call. However it did go through 4 revisions > since San Francisco. So before we proceed, I'd like to ask if anybody is > seeing showstopper issues with the draft in its current form. In which case > we'll need to work on this draft some more before sending it to LC. If > there > are small issues though, we can defer them to the last call process. > > Please respond to the list, or to Paul and myself. > > Thanks, > Yaron > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > > [email protected] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 18:45 > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05.txt > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions > > Working Group of the IETF. > > > > > > Title : Wrapped ESP for Traffic Visibility > > Author(s) : K. Grewal, et al. > > Filename : draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05.txt > > Pages : 13 > > Date : 2009-06-24 > > > > This document describes the Wrapped Encapsulating Security > > Payload (WESP) protocol, which builds on top of Encapsulating > > Security Payload (ESP) [RFC4303] and is designed to allow > > intermediate devices to ascertain if ESP-NULL [RFC2410] is being > > employed and hence inspect the IPsec packets for network > > monitoring and access control functions. Currently in the IPsec > > standard, there is no way to differentiate between ESP > > encryption and ESP NULL encryption by simply examining a packet. > > This poses certain challenges to the intermediate devices that > > need to deep inspect the packet before making a decision on what > > should be done with that packet (Inspect and/or Allow/Drop). The > > mechanism described in this document can be used to easily > > disambiguate ESP-NULL from ESP encrypted packets, without > > compromising on the security provided by ESP. > > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility- > > 05.txt > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > > Internet-Draft. > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
