And this is exactly the table that I claim needs to remain in the spec. A list
of errors - even if partial! - is essential to understanding a protocol.
Thanks,
Yaron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Paul Hoffman
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 4:38
> To: Keith Welter
> Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: [IPsec] Closing #25
>
> At 11:42 AM -0800 11/11/09, Keith Welter wrote:
> >A design team was convened including Dan McDonald, Tero Kivinen, Raj
> Singh, David Wierbowski and Keith Welter to resolve Issue #22. The design
> team reached agreement on the following general approach as well as
> specific proposed text: . . .
>
> Many, many thanks for all this work. I have now input all the text (with
> some wordsmithing and rearranging) in -06. However, I have changed one
> part:
>
> At 11:42 AM -0800 11/11/09, Keith Welter wrote:
> >3.10.1. Notify Message Types (Updates)
> >...
> >NOTIFY messages: error types Value
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >...
> >TEMPORARY_FAILURE 40
> >See section 2.25.
> >
> >CHILD_SA_NOT_FOUND 41
> >See section 2.25.
> >
> >RESERVED TO IANA 42-8191
> >...
>
> The values 40 and 41 *are already taken* in the IANA registry. I have
> substituted {TBA1} and {TBA2} for them in -06. (This reaffirms my desire
> to implement issue #123 and rip out the old tables.)
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
